Disruptive Technologies

From Wikireedia
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
See other Strategies for Managing Change.
 
See other Strategies for Managing Change.
 +
*[[Strategy and Practice 9 - Strategies For Managing Change]]
 +
*[[Strategy and Practice 9.1 Strategies for Managing Change]]
  
  

Revision as of 14:28, 12 September 2012

A disruptive technology is a new technological innovation, product, or service that eventually overturns the existing dominant technology or product in the market. Disruptive innovations can be broadly classified into lower-end and new-market disruptive innovations. A new-market disruptive innovation is often aimed at non-consumption, whereas a lower-end disruptive innovation is aimed at main stream customers who were ignored by established companies. Sometimes, a disruptive technology comes to dominate an existing market by either filling a role in a new market that the older technology could not fill (as more expensive, lower capacity but smaller-sized hard disks did for newly developed notebook computers in the 1980s) or by successively moving up-market through performance improvements until finally displacing the market incumbents (as digital photography has begun to replace film photography).

In his well-known work The Innovator’s Dilemma, Christensen (2000) tackles the tough problem of why do big smart companies fail to innovate. For this purpose, he led in-depth studies of the technological evolution of industries such as the hard disk drive industry, the mechanical excavator industry and the steel industry. His findings can be summarised in the following ideas.

The causes of failure could not be attributed to established firms’ inadequate competence in new technological fields. Indeed, evidence is strong that as long as the new technology was required to address the needs of their customers, established firms were able to muster the expertise, capital suppliers, energy and rationale to develop and implement the requisite technology competitively and effectively. This has been true for incremental as well as radical advances. It was only when confronted with disruptive technologies that they failed. The reason for this failure is, according to Christensen, good management itself.

IBM discovered this reality in 1999 after realising that during several years it had missed the emergence of new industries closely related to its base of resources and capabilities. IBM discovered through an analysis of dozens of missed opportunities that its management system was only effective to deal with currently served markets and existing offerings, and decided to create a completely different management system for innovative initiatives, called the Emergent Business Opportunities (EBO) programme.

See other Strategies for Managing Change.


<comments />

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox